Springe zum Hauptinhalt
Professur für Physikalische Chemie/Elektrochemie
Elektrochemie

in situ Conductivity and UV-Vis Spectroelectrochemical Measurements of Chemically Synthesized Polyaniline and Poly(o-toluidine)

Since the discovery of conducting polyacetylene in 1977, intrinsically conducting polymers (ICPs) have attracted substantial attention due to their unique properties and potential applica-tions [1 ,2 ]. Among ICPs, polyaniline (PANI) and its derivatives are under extensive investigations because of their high environmental stability, simple polymerization process and tunable electrical conductivity [ 3- 5].

PANI has potential applications in batteries [ 6], anion exchangers [ 7, 8], tissue engineering [9 ],
corrosion protection[ 10], sensors [11 ] and so on. However, the stiffness of PANI backbone makes it insoluble in common organic solvents and thus limits its technological applications [12, 13].


Emulsion / inverse emulsion polymerization is considered to be one of the promising methods to improve the processability of PANI. In emulsion polymerization process aniline, a protonic acid and an oxidant are mixed with water and a non-polar solvent. However, in this case it is difficult to obtain the product in the pure form, as the PANI remains entrapped in the emulsion along with the by-products of the reaction and hence collection of PANI salt in its pure form becomes difficult.

 

In a recent attempt, PANI and its derivative poly(o-toluidine) POT, was synthesized according to the following inverse emulsion pathway in which a mixture of chloroform and 2-butanol was used as dispersing medium for the first time [14] . The polymers were collected in their salt form and were found to be pure and completely soluble in a large number of common organic solvents. In the present project these polymers will be tested in situ for their conductance as well as in-situ UV-Vis spectroelectrochemical properties.


References

 
 1 R. K. Paul, C. K. S. Pillai, Polym. Int. 50 (2001) 381
 2 J. Y. Kwon, E. Y. Kim, H .D. Kim, Macromol. Res. 12 (2004) 303 
 3 D. Yuping, W. Guangli, L. Xiaogang, J. Zhijiang, L. Shunhua, L. Weiping, Sol. Stat. Sci. 12 (2010) 1374. 
 4 A. John, S. K. Mahadeva, J. Kim. Smart. Mater. Struct, 19 (2010) 45011.  
 5 X. G. Li, M. R. Huang, Y. Yang, Polym. J. 32 (2000) 353. 
 6 M. H. Lee, Y. C. Luo, J. S. Do, J. Power. Sourc. 146 (2005) 340.
 7 R. Ansari, Acta. Chim. Slov. 53 (2006) 88.
 8 M. Ghorbani, H. Esfandian, N. Taghipour, R. Katal, Desalination 263 (2010) p. 279. , 
 9 M. Li, Y. Guo, Y. Wei, A. G. MacDiarmid, P. I. Lelkes, Biomaterials 27 (2006) p. 2705 
10 M. Kraljic, Z. Mandic, L. Duic, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003) p. 181.  
11 S. Virji, J. Huang, R. B. Kaner, B. H. Weiller, Nano. Lett. 4 (2004) p. 491, 
12 M. R. Nabid, Z. Zamiraei, R. Sedghi, N. Safari, React. Funct. Polym. 69 (2009) p. 319.
13 P. Ghosh, S. K. Siddhanta, S. R. Haque, A. Chakrabarti, Synth. Met. 123 (2001) p. 83.
14 S. Bilal, S. Gul, K. Ali, A.A. Shah, Synth. Met. 162 (2012) p. 2259.