in situ Conductivity and UV-Vis Spectroelectrochemical Measurements of Chemically Synthesized Polyaniline and Poly(o-toluidine)
Since the discovery of conducting polyacetylene in 1977, intrinsically conducting polymers (ICPs) have attracted substantial attention due to their unique properties and potential applica-tions [1 ,2 ]. Among ICPs, polyaniline (PANI) and its derivatives are under extensive investigations because of their high environmental stability, simple polymerization process and tunable electrical conductivity [ 3- 5].
PANI has potential applications in batteries [ 6], anion exchangers [ 7, 8], tissue engineering [9 ],
corrosion protection[ 10], sensors [11 ] and so on. However, the stiffness of PANI backbone makes it insoluble in common organic solvents and thus limits its technological applications [12, 13].
Emulsion / inverse emulsion polymerization is considered to be one of the promising methods to improve the processability of PANI. In emulsion polymerization process aniline, a protonic acid and an oxidant are mixed with water and a non-polar solvent. However, in this case it is difficult to obtain the product in the pure form, as the PANI remains entrapped in the emulsion along with the by-products of the reaction and hence collection of PANI salt in its pure form becomes difficult.
In a recent attempt, PANI and its derivative poly(o-toluidine) POT, was synthesized according to the following inverse emulsion pathway in which a mixture of chloroform and 2-butanol was used as dispersing medium for the first time [14] . The polymers were collected in their salt form and were found to be pure and completely soluble in a large number of common organic solvents. In the present project these polymers will be tested in situ for their conductance as well as in-situ UV-Vis spectroelectrochemical properties.
References
1 | R. K. Paul, C. K. S. Pillai, Polym. Int. 50 (2001) 381 |
2 | J. Y. Kwon, E. Y. Kim, H .D. Kim, Macromol. Res. 12 (2004) 303 |
3 | D. Yuping, W. Guangli, L. Xiaogang, J. Zhijiang, L. Shunhua, L. Weiping, Sol. Stat. Sci. 12 (2010) 1374. |
4 | A. John, S. K. Mahadeva, J. Kim. Smart. Mater. Struct, 19 (2010) 45011. |
5 | X. G. Li, M. R. Huang, Y. Yang, Polym. J. 32 (2000) 353. |
6 | M. H. Lee, Y. C. Luo, J. S. Do, J. Power. Sourc. 146 (2005) 340. |
7 | R. Ansari, Acta. Chim. Slov. 53 (2006) 88. |
8 | M. Ghorbani, H. Esfandian, N. Taghipour, R. Katal, Desalination 263 (2010) p. 279. , |
9 | M. Li, Y. Guo, Y. Wei, A. G. MacDiarmid, P. I. Lelkes, Biomaterials 27 (2006) p. 2705 |
10 | M. Kraljic, Z. Mandic, L. Duic, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003) p. 181. |
11 | S. Virji, J. Huang, R. B. Kaner, B. H. Weiller, Nano. Lett. 4 (2004) p. 491, |
12 | M. R. Nabid, Z. Zamiraei, R. Sedghi, N. Safari, React. Funct. Polym. 69 (2009) p. 319. |
13 | P. Ghosh, S. K. Siddhanta, S. R. Haque, A. Chakrabarti, Synth. Met. 123 (2001) p. 83. |
14 | S. Bilal, S. Gul, K. Ali, A.A. Shah, Synth. Met. 162 (2012) p. 2259. |